I get that. What I’m saying is that a company would let you sell your stocks. So this is much worse than a company
Discussion
You're defining a company as a legitimate company. I'm defining it as a band of people trying to make a profit. I consider the government to be an illegitimate corporation that has deceived people into thinking it is legitimate, which takes things from people and does things to people without their consent and without any valid contract explaining the extents of its powers.
Yes I’m comparing to a company that issues stocks that you can buy and when you’re done you can sell the stock. Anyways, doesn’t matter
So we agree, I was just trying to point out that if we can call an aggressive company a company, then this is still just an overgrown aggressive company and the means to defend against it are the same we should use to defend against any other aggressor or fraudster. That's my point in using this language. We are not helpless against it.