People from european origins are still imigrants.

Are you claiming, that the USA is racist and humiliating based on origin by design? So you would consider it unamerican, when someone lifes, works, parties or otherwise interacts with people that are non-europeans?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Every race needs exclusive territory of its own if it is to survive. It's not hateful or wrong even in the slightest degree to secure such territory.

Oh boy. I disagree with you, but also I wasn’t even talking about racial diversity. That’s a part of it, but also religion diversity as well.

Under a common principles understanding. There was great diversity at the time from even Europeans here…and your mentioning a naturalization law from people who did not have women or slaves as voting members of society at the time of course. We can take the spirit of the founders in this case…these things have updated of course

I think the spirit of the Founders can be fairly summarized as follows: They wanted a Whites-only meritocracy.

As for religion, with a few exceptions, they didn't want the new government interfering with it.

Haha very funny 😂

Please read the first part on what a meritocracy is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy

I hope you spot as well, that "white-only" does not fit into meritocracy. Since a meritocracy evaluates by what person knows and is able to do. So it is a system that bases on inclusion.

I'm not going to debate word definitions with midwits tonight.

I wasn't even referring to my own positions. I did, however, fairly summarize the Founders' general point of view. If you don't like the Founders' views, take it up with George Washington.

After all, a person who is able to take an insane conception like racial equality seriously is also likely to believe he can argue with the spirits of the dead.