Nostr Web Client

I want to use my government's overreliance on rights violations to defeat it, not rely on my own rights violations to defeat it.

It seems incredibly pathetic to me to cry and whine about all the property that government controls. If we have had the right to it whole time, then we shouldn't need to seize it back by force in the first place.

Vikingarna1990 1y ago

You have no rights.

Without private property rights, which is the basis of all other rights, you have absolutely zero rights.

You only have privileges. All privileges can be removed.

Privileges are: "Your" life, children, pension, money, stocks, speech, assembly, guns, house, land and socks.

Ergo, the government cannot commit rights violations. You do not have any rights. They just removes privileges.

The property owners grant or removes privileges. This is King Charles III, the European Commission, the POTUS and the US Congress, etc.

It's legal and perfectly OK to kill you, lock you down and inject your children to death.

You can be ejected from "your" house and replaced by Africans.

There is no "justice" system or rule of "law." The judges are slaves too, and they have no rights, either. The courts are owned by the Marxist state. The courts just juggles privileges around. It is not evidence-based. It is privilege-based.

The judge knows perfectly well which side his privileges are buttered on, which is the Marxist state.

In a court of "law," the slaves are adjudicated by other slaves higher up on the privilege scale.

Without property rights, why even have courts, lawyers and judges? This is a very dangerous situation.

These professions must be abolished. All judges should be killed off. These characters are invariably Marxist state operators.

Lawyers will have to find something less destructive to do. Flush it all down the toilet.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Scoundrel 1y ago

I see you still haven't responded to the post I lovingly crafted just for you. nostr:nevent1qqsgfqddz8xpe0zh9cdkajlvs8mfdfeur76le3dkwhwzfmmn59he47qpzemhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnj7q3q4pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcsxpqqqqqqz7e260j You're going to make me sad. I was interested to see how you'd respond.

It seems to me that you believe that if somrthing can be taken away, then it isn't a right. Am I understanding your position correctly? If so, I would like to know: can you name anything different that you believe can prevent something from being a right? Can you name a situation where something cannot be taken away, but it still isn't a right?

Vikingarna1990 1y ago

You understood me correctly.

The only thing that cannot be taken away is dignity.

If they can tax you, they choose how you live. Your taxes can be raised to 100 percent, thereby erasing you from the planet. Your food can be taken, thereby erasing your children from the planet.

Donald Trump injected 50,000 children to death, and he permanently damaged 500,000 more. It was perfectly legal. No rights were removed. They didn't have any rights. The privilege to live was removed.

If the "right" to free speech and free movement were rights, the people removing them would be arrested and annihilated by the state. Accordingly, King Charles III would be beheaded for slaughtering 233,000 of subjects.

These "rights" were privileges all along.

You have one inalienable right according to nature's law:

You can kill them all.

Scoundrel 1y ago

Er, thank you for responding, but your messages have some serious problems. You already said that "you have no rights," but now you've turned around and said "you have one right." (To kill all agents of the state apparently.)

You also committed to the idea that anything which can be taken away can't be a right, but I'm pretty sure that the ability to kill agents of the state can be taken away in a number of ways pretty easily.

And finally, you responded to my questions about rights by telling me that "the only thing that cannot be taken away is dignity." But unfortunately your response doesn't really provide me any insight into your notion of rights, since you don't actually tell me whether you consider dignity to be a right or not. Additionally, I'm just as lost as to how you expect me to interpret "dignity" as I am with how you interpret the word "right". It doesn't help that dignity seems like it can be taken away just as easily as with all your other examples.

I guess I have to ask you, what exactly are you trying to do in this concersation? Are you just saying things to test me and try to see what I'll disagree with? Are you jusy trying to be edgy in order to look cool or something? Are you just trying to explain your beliefs about rights? I'm really not sure how to respond to you at this point.

Vikingarna1990 1y ago

You have no rights.

When I say you have the right to kill Marxist state operators, I mean it's OK according to nature's law.

You have the "right" to do it.

Dignity is not a right. You don't have private property rights, so you have absolutely zero rights. It's pretty easy to understand the concept. There is no "justice" system or "rule of law."

If there is an income tax, you are a slave. You own nothing. A slave has no rights. A slave only has privileges. All privileges can be taken away.

The rest is a charade, a theater production. There is no democracy, liberalism or capitalism. There are only your owners, i.e. the owners of the Marxist state. They grant or remove privileges.

Your dignity is taken away if you don't kill Marxist state operatives, Jews and Jew-lovers.

If you wait for the final injection while watching the theater show, hiding away in the back seat, you have no dignity.

People with dignity are those who kills Jews, Jew-lovers and Marxists. These fine personalities are the highest quality specimens of Homo sapiens. They must be treasured.

The rest of the population are parasites or hosts to varying degrees. This is genetically derived, and that's why it's so dangerous to have a purely parasitical system such a Jewish Marxism existing.

The entire structure has to be discarded to free the plebs from an existence of eternally engaging in parasitism.

There is nothing outside the Marxist state. You can't hide from Judeo-Bolshevism 2.0.

Marxism is total in scope, so it must be annihilated in its totality.

The entire "welfare" state must be eradicated and so must all its active operators.

I estimate the number of active Marxist state operatives to be around two to three percent of the population.

It includes all politicians currently living, all professors, all journalists, all sociologists, all judges, most teachers, all "doctors" who work for the state, all lawyers who work for the state, etc.

These operatives will never let go off the Marxist state. They're fed by it. They extract nutriments from it. They will never relent unless they're dead.

Marxists state operators have direct access to your bank account in the name of the "welfare" state. This is an extremely revolutionary idea, and it forms the core of Marxism.

"Welfare" is decided solely by those who grant or remove privileges, i.e. the property owners AKA lawmakers.

Marxism is a parasite-host system. Marxism is radical and revolutionary. Marxists and Jews are extremely aggressive breeds.

Accordingly, they can only be successfully countered with even more extreme aggression and radicalism, i.e. total obliteration.

If they are not physically eliminated, you're ultimately fucked.

Expect unprecedented pain and suffering.

Scoundrel 1y ago

Why don't you consider dignity to be a right? You already said that dignity cannot be taken away. What is dignity still missing in order to be a right in your eyes?