I've always wondered why the zap split couldn't be resolved directly from the protocol. At the protocol level, 5% of the zap split is specified, so that it can not be audited by the Apple client #[0] #[1]
Discussion
With some modifications, NWC could do it easily 🐶🐾🫡
🫡🫂💜Great, before Damus set the zap split ratio in the client's wallet, Apple would not allow profit sharing without going through it. So it won't be approved. It is possible to set the zap split ratio in the wallet through the wallet that supports NWC, such as setting the ratio column directly in the Alby wallet, and not in the Apple client, which can completely avoid Apple's audit. Do you need to add a NIP so that each client can choose whether to implement the NIP or not?
Not necessarily, but having it standardized can help other NWC implementations follow. 🐶🐾🫡
🐶🫡Great, right after the protocol is implemented, developers can fill in the code with the default Lightning wallet address that accepts zap splitting. In this way, Nostr protocol will at least have a basic revenue business model, the more users, the more zap, the developer can get a certain income. A Zap split would be a Nostr change in the way business is done. I'm not a programmer, I don't know how to submit this NIP yet #[4]
Like prisms ?
Yes, that way Apple has no idea how you got past him to split the client zap. He wants a share of the profits.