https://barsoom.substack.com/p/the-eye-at-the-end-of-time

I recommend the first half of this (before the subscriber shill) and not the second half

I think there's a more fundamental division to be made here, rather than future vs past or Jesus vs "Progress" (which after all are not so different... being judged at the end of the world vs at the end of time)

Instead, I think the division is between subjective and objective, or more fundamentally between a reality that exists here and now independent of consciousness and a "reality" that is subordinate to consciousness. The "Eye at the End of Time" posits morality as something to be judged by a conscious observer (hence "Eye"). In contrast I view morality as part of reality - this works, that doesn't. This leads to flourishing, that does not.

I think this distinction (between a world of consciousness and a world of existence) is the fundamental philosophic and political distinction. The left supports group consciousness (an impossibility) while the traditional right supports divine consciousness (also an impossibility). Those who support reality for its own sake are rogues and hermits.