I sat down with four professors of law last Saturday, all retirement age, all highly intelligent erudite experts. I explained Nostr to them, one of them immediately understood the how but not the why. She said it would become a source of misinformation. I asked her: "What exactly is misinformation? More important is not having a small group of people deciding on what is broadcasted and what is censored."
Discussion
What she said after that?
To me, it sounds like a knee-jerk reaction from someone who has never been confronted with the ideas of freedom. They usually tend to believe that the State has our best interests at heart and therefore, only the State can efficiently organise society. They might be subject matter experts in their own fields, but it doesn't matter much if they can't think outside the box...
That makes sense