Replying to Avatar Vitor Pamplona

The codebase can be smaller, but I don't think it will be small enough to please your paranoia.

After all, you would still need screens to display the wallet and allow the user to set it up and manage it.

If you want to support multiple accounts, that gets worse.

Amber's codebase is mostly big because of the NIP-46 bunker implementation/notifications, which I think can be moved to a different app just for that with the use of Pokey to receive those events.

That being said, Amber is not supposed to be the only signer available. Other signer apps should exist and compete with Amber for a place in the user's hearts.
Avatar
DanConwayDev 1y ago

I really like what nostr:npub1w4uswmv6lu9yel005l3qgheysmr7tk9uvwluddznju3nuxalevvs2d0jr5I is doing with Amber. The idea stems from how unconformable I feel as I smash the update button every time a pre-release version is issued.

separation of concerns is great for advanced users but will probably end up being used by a minority of users.

I love the idea of using a notification app like Pokey for to reduce duplication, open websocket connections and battery usage.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
DanConwayDev 1y ago

I don't actually want my signer app to be dumb. I want the sort of optionality that Amber brings about what gets signed automatically and when I should get prompted. I want to be regularly interacting with my signer. I want innovation and updates to improve this experience. Maybe other people want something different from their signer app eg. simplicity and minimalism, security and infrequent updates?