Why do we tolerate neo-Malthusians constantly whinging about overpopulation?

Genuine question.

The solution to these peoples problems is suicide. They believe the world is overpopulated, ergo they should kill themselves and help solve the problem they believe they have identified.

On other platforms I can’t tell them to kill themselves or I’ll get booted despite the fact it’s literally the logical conclusion of their own argument.

Why shouldn’t we meme these pricks into an early grave rather than allow them to shift the Overton Window?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If we suicide 18 bloodlines we'll change the world.

I’m ready

I'm right there with you. The good thing is most of those whining about overpopulation won't be producing offspring. If you haven't bought into the nonsense the best thing you can do is have children and move on. Also, keep them out of the public indoctrination camps, where this garbage originates.

These neo-Malthusians benefit from modern medicine like the rest of us and m live to 70-80-90 regardless of children born.

For decades their whinging about overpopulation drags the Overton Window to their view that the world is overpopulated.

I’m not going to ignore them, how can I? They’re literally trying to eradicate my species.

Tell me why we shouldn’t we just get rid of them with this in mind?

So on one end I must believe that the world is overpopulated and we need to walk our asses into the sea, and then at the same time we have a population decline with lowest birth rates across many countries way under replacement levels?

Exactly. I post a bunch about demographics on here, I know how important it is because I also post about living in a society and how important that is.

Why shouldn’t I just help get these fuckers off the planet? They want fewer humans but don’t want to volunteer, well let’s not make it voluntary for them any more and just do what they don’t have the balls to do.

Doubt we’re gonna miss the next Einstein by ending some neo-Malthusian bloodlines. You’ve gotta be at minimum semi retarded to believe that shit

In reality, the act of producing more population is a singularity in terms of scarcity.

Imagine we are in a bitcoin standard. Every added person should add exponentially to its network effect.

When a thing is perceived as scarce, it increases in value and people produce more of it because they think it will give them more wealth (in this case by giving them more money).

When a thing is perceived as non-scarce, people focus their energy on better profiles of opportunity cost

All of this doesn't occur in human reproduction. When society produces more humans, it would increase the exponential effect of Bitcoin, making everyone in the planet stupidly richer. This means there's a direct incentive for every human in the planet to reproduce more and more because doing the exact same action will make everyone more and more wealthy in an asymmetric fashion, a thing that is unnatural in every other mean of production

Neo malthusianism is just a bad attempt from the fiat world to keep you poor. You can think about it as the final form of cuckness