I know it is not common but there are still people that do science, experiments and do not trust authority but just test what works and what doesn't. If you then know business models, marketing and a bit of phycology you can predict what is true or not just watching how they push it on people through the media. Viruses? I don't know but ClO2 works fine against whatever is that stuff. Nuclear bombs... Well nuclear emissions are there. Never tried to reach a nuclear explosion but it's quite simple to verify the cascade action of decay due to neutron emissions. I did the experiment at 16.
Discussion
https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2
I couldn't maintain a belief in "nukes" after reading this.
The physics behind nukes is correct. The engineering difficulties are huge. We do not know if they have been overcome. There are many things we in theory could do but then we cannot for now
Yes, and also Bruce Maguire has the best deep dive.
Nuclear fission with the radioactivity and decay products is indeed pretty easily verifiable. In my opinion definitely a real phenomenon.
But that does not prove that nuclear bombs exist or are even viable.
By the way, now that I think of this. Many years ago I looked into this topic out of personal interest.
It seems that when nuclear material warms up, it absorbs less neutrons, thus stabilizing the reaction at a certain temperature.
(Also explains reactor meltdowns not resulting in an explosion like a nuclear bomb, but instead some kind of blob of "elephant's foot")
But I am not an expert :)