Hahaha, good point. If I then make a pure descriptive proposition about that matter, sans my biases, the only facts of the case that I would find would be: that there is the dog (color, posture, hairy-ness, etc), then the cracklin sounds (maybe vibrations, etc), and then the ensuing barks (maybe including the quantity, meter, patterns of sound, etc). But one CANNOT find “joy” or “dislike” or any other emotion contained within that particular happening. There was no “emotion” at all that can be found in the event. The mind can then be blamed as the only source of that emotion.