Paul Sztorc is an intractible retard who can write hundreds of pages of proposals, but can't read a room. He has never made anything useful or practical. He has been beating the drivechain drum for 8 years now, and he was so desperate to see it happen, he courted bitcoin cash first; all his bios gleefully quote Roger Vet's nonsense praises of him.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I cannot stress enough how close the number of fucks Paul Sztorc has for Bitcoiners long-term stability approaches zero. The blockchain is just a large laboratory for his mad science experiments. He is not even a bad actor. He's just autistically up his own ass.

Are you a chat bot ?

Drive chain contributes tonlomg term stability by reducing the changes to bitcoin core. If we want to try new things they can be done on a L2 side chain instead. The exact opposite of your claim.

you look triggered

Describe to me the technical impact of drivechains on the reference implementation.

You just got here 5 minutes ago and already look desperate to promote a dead fork proposal. Great look. I expect great things from this npub.

Interesting; I didn't know there were such strong views against this.

Can you please do another post with more info about why drivechains are a bad idea?

I have no dog in this fight fyi. Actually, I'm probably on your side (on the side of conservatism and not messing with Bitcoin), but so far I've only heard Sztorc's side of things (on P. "Nuance" M.'s show for instance).

drivechain is a very conservative change

>i don't like the way someone speaks so their points are wrong.

what does "intractable" even mean in this context, why would you want to control him.

you're weird