nostr:nprofile1qqswswmx4rkj6d7q05dtafhpkqq2z42fc62s37jvtp642m2jkpfxc2cpzamhxue69uhkummjw35hxtnwdaehgu339e3k7mgpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq75fpc started chatting about it having stopped recording on our episode
Feels a very important topic to get across
This is my take:
nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp6pmv65w6tfhcp73404xuxcqpg24f8rf2z86f3v824td22c9ymptqyv8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwv3sk6atn9e5k7tcprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuem9w3skccne9e3k7mf0wccsqgra6vnf7sc33vj356ak75430ungrulrndajawp3g45y6ndzyu6hwch652na
One guest speaker is not going to help. We the audience need a proper moderated debate.
And what Bitcoin nodes need are a testing ground where trial and error happens. All this what-if's and predicting unintended consequences reeks of central planning, whether it's for Knots or for Core changes. The reality is both options have opportunity costs.
