literal commentary. an elegant speech - he educates, unsnarls narratives just enough to help bridge misunderstanding, pushes the boundaries of acceptable while being intellectual and respectful. he actually deeply understand his topics, which allow him to, even during a prepared speech, demonstrate he is capable of nimble conversation and discussion. he recognizes bitcoin and digital data are only as useful as citizen access to it, and he easily navigated the thin line between explaining it literally by challenging some of the buzz words usually flung around. he's personable relatable and interesting. he recognizes there is no bitcoin or any free asset without a protected and free internet and sets the stage for slowly unraveling the narratives which choke the entire tech community because of his broad spectrum understanding of all social layers (which is rare). he would easily beat trump because trump won't have the same seriousness to match his intellectualism and kennedy wouldn't tolerate being bullied. i suggest if he isn't the candidate in the end, he's the vp, though i know that probably not popular amongst the purists who made a deal with the devil over mars. eyeroll.