nostr:npub100m0lzd74pgdnvk3s50eqcepnzptesr6guldm25hwu2a923uex0smrsyur
It is officialโฆ you are trolling. You once stated that there is no way to censor valid transactions and I agree. In this latest post you say that Knots is censoring.
You sir, Mr. Snuffleupagus are BUSTED! You really had me going for a minute there.
Censoring from the mempool, not blocks. Two totally different things, dumbass.
Let's try to keep this civil. A difference of opinion only, technically the Devs could be right, and maybe removing this code makes it simpler. But this was approached in the wrong way.
Thereโs no right way to approach something if plebs, no matter what, are going to act hysterical and claim Bitcoin Core is actively sabotaging bitcoin.
They did with Segwit no?
I donโt think Core โDevelopersโ specifically are sabotaging Bitcoin. I think they are coders that want to code and that is amazing!
They want to code for something that I donโt agree with. I donโt want Bitcoin code being change by anything if we can help it. I am worried about the consequences, not the act they are proposing.
Hilarious but true! I donโt wanna fight. I just repeated his words. He can fight himself. I wonder who will win??
Hey, flattery will get you everywhere with me. Itโs Mr. Dumbass to you. I can take a punch and a joke.
You actually may be right though. I am dumb about this. Do transactions in the mempool end up in blocks?
How do we change the block if not while it is in the mempool. This is a serious question. I may be dumb, but I donโt wanna get this wrong and be an ass also. Lol
