You assume that there is one user and all the rest are just different identities of the same adversary but given the adversary cannot prevent others to joining, that scenario is extremely unlikely.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

yeah

when there's zero barrier to entry, how do we prevent the Adversary from sybiling the rounds at will and degrading everyone's privacy?

I have explained that above twice. Now, it is your time to understand. It seems to me that you don't want to understand.

So if I understand correctly there is nothing preventing nine of the ten participants from being a single entity

You just think it's unlikely that someone would flood the rounds to denigrate anonymity

Do I have that right?

No. You should prevent somehow other honest users from participating, what you cannot do.

since theres no penalty to flooding or any bar to entry at all,

users entering a CJ round are *trusting they are building a transaction with other honest users

maybe its a good trust assumption

i dunno

but thats what it is

Ok. Please sybil attack the kruw's coordinator and let me know the results.