Replying to Avatar Bitcoin_To_The_Oblivion

You started misguiding again without going into nuances.

Chainsplits created by contentious soft forks are not meant to be permanent.

On permanent chainsplits like bcash, sure. Not the case here.

I am not an OG like yourself but as far as I know, never in the history of Bitcoin has any exchange offered old coin and SF coin in the event of a SF. This one will be contentious and it might happen, but still one of the coins will die so it doesn't make much sense to offer the choice.

The most frustrating part about your recent tweets/comments related to core vs knots debate (& BIP 444) is 80IQ like myself gets these nuances but you don't.

I think you get the nuances too but since you have become CORECUCK, you just chose to not get into nuances.
Avatar
Bitcoin_To_The_Oblivion 2mo ago 💬 1

Don't let nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aqnz0fd0 gaslight you plebs.

I can't wait for him to tell me LIAR.

On a side note, he is trying hard to become Luke 2.0 without having BALLS to call out shitcoin core and shitcoin core devs for enabling more spam on bitcoin timechain.

nostr:nevent1qqsv9zj52vduxejaf26cxmd3zpn4luylsj2q9clj8p6q3vd6uf8sulszyqfuh8u32fg5q3sr52k9csvqtddymetlvvpqtg6ellv4eggh8xcnxqcyqqqqqqgdg7pju

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Waitwhat 2mo ago

I’ll read BIP444 when it’s listed, and of course enjoy money data on the bitcoin network (not spam,) but making a fork because legal (or moral) liability is the risk, well, who gets to make the decision what’s legal or moral?