> There are many open ecosystems such as Nostr or Lens. How is Spasm different?

Nostr and Lens are indeed much more open ecosystems comparative to legacy social media such as Twitter, Reddit and Telegram, which are centralized platforms with zero interoperability. However, Nostr and Lens are very closed ecosystems comparative to Spasm because they require users to use certain private keys, networks, messaging protocols, etc.

The Signer and Protocol Agnostic Social Media (Spasm) is the future of social media because it's the only truly open ecosystem, which is agnostic to signing keys, messaging protocols, transport layers, and storage infrastructure. Users are able to sign messages with any private key of their choice and trigger the propagation of those messages in any network they want via any transport protocol, or even all at once.

Besides, Spasm integrates other solutions as modules. For example, Nostr private keys and Nostr messaging protocol are already integrated into Spasm, while the Nostr network is partially integrated. If Lens will come up with something good, e.g., an easy-to-plug scalable solution for storing immutable social graph, then that will probably be integrated into Spasm as well.