Nostr Web Client

key word: employer.

this does NOT mean what the common person thinks it does.

it refers to an Office/Officer of the federal government.

the definition does not include private americans working and doing business in the private sector because such a compelled, direct tax without apportionment is expressly prohibited by the Constitution.

DC is foreign relative to the several States. Those laws fly for employees/ers of the fed because such PERSONS do not have the same Constitutional protections as We the PEOPLE.

'twas the same with infamous Gold confiscation - then as now, "my people perish for a lack of knowledge."

That was The Book of the.... LAW, you see. So THAT would be the type of knowledge referred to.

Learn #law or die a slave.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

AaNon 🤔 1d ago 💬 2

Uh, have you READ the 16th Amendment, which specifically eliminated the apportionment requirement?

"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, FROM WHATEVER SOURCE DERIVED, WITHOUT APPORTIONMENT without among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

Weatherall 1d ago 💬 1

uh, have YOU read the Constitution which states clearly and absolutely that such a law would be immediately null and void?

uh, have YOU familiariazed yourself with anything other than being a fucking unamerican conformist faggot and ill-informed cuck betrayer of liberty and all your higher-quality ancestors fought for??

maybe you are just a dumb fucking nigger... oh wait! you are: https://www.williamsandwilliamslawfirm.com/a-treatise-on-the-word-person

FYI, You Stupid Fucking Cunt:

In 1916, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed once again that the 16th Amendment conferred no new taxing powers in its ruling in STANTON v. BALTIC MINING CO., 240 US 103, 112 -114 (1916):

“Not being within the authority of the 16th Amendment, the tax is therefore, within the ruling of Pollack… a direct tax and void for want of compliance with the regulation of apportionment.”

“… it manifestly disregards the fact that by the previous ruling it was settled that the provisions of the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation..”

“… it was settled in Stratton’s Independence… that such tax is not a tax upon property… but a true excise levied on the result of the business..”

Also in 1916, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed prior rulings on the 16th Amendment:

BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO., 240 US 1, 11 (1916):

“… the confusion is not inherent, but rather arises from the conclusion that the 16th Amendment provides for a hitherto unknown power of taxation; that is, a power to levy an income tax which, although direct, should not be subject to the regulation of apportionment applicable to all other direct taxes. And the far-reaching effect of this erroneous assumption will be made clear by generalizing the many contentions advanced in argument to support it ….”

In BRUSHABER, the Court remarked on the confusion that would multiply if the contentions of radical new taxing powers were acceded to:

BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO., 240 US 1, 12 (1916):

“… the contentions under it (the 16th Amendment), if acceded to, would cause one provision of the Constitution to destroy another; that is, they would result in bringing the provisions of the Amendment exempting a direct tax from apportionment into irreconcilable conflict with the general requirement that all direct taxes be apportioned. … This result, instead of simplifying the situation and making clear the limitations on the taxing power … would create radical and destructive changes in our constitutional system and multiply confusion.”

YOU ARE THE PROBLEM nostr:npub1cxggmvc4sugglquu23kdnwe49rdp8m4y64f8hpekvn8n92rzqtjq04q0wg - BECAUSE YOU ARE A DUMB FUCKING FAITHLESS PIECE OF SHIT...

GO. FUCK. YOURSELF you fucking useless sewer rat.

Weatherall 1d ago 💬 2

and here a few quotes from the Supreme Court to bounce around in your little sub-saharan fucking peabrain... either explain all of this or SHUT THE FUCK UP BITCH.

Weatherall 1d ago

*from Supreme and other courts...

AaNon 🤔 1d ago 💬 1

I just like to provoke you to see what foolishness and vile incentive you will spew next! 🤣

Weatherall 1d ago

"in an effort to hide the fact that you've just publicly pulled back the veil on my own recalcitrant narcissism and cowardly ignorance, im just gonna plead that im a feminine vindictive asshole"

got it...