The incentives of this protocol are broken. Name one alternative wasabi coordinator. Maybe the chaincase one, is it still maintained? Doubt it. And if there was one, the liquidity is so low, that you’ll hardly gain any privacy.

But to offer you a hand: for normal usage, I think the address reuse problem, Wasabi isn’t able to solve is a minor problem in my view, embarrassing though.

My main issue is their compliance bootlicking. Writing blog articles about crypto anarchy on the one hand and blacklisting non compliant utxos. What hypocrites…

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

None of the reasons you just listed give any weaknesses of the WabiSabi. You are just complaining about a single coordinator's business practices instead of proving your claims that WabiSabi isn't the most private way to create a coinjoin transaction.

You can look up more than enough adress reuses on chain.

But don’t get me wrong, I might consider using wabisabi if there would be a based coordinator around.

So please give me a hint which one I should use…