commenting on others,

In my idea, the moderators list is an addressable event with a “d” tag as a topic.

I meant that we should still use kind-7 for upvotes (no one uses this as downvotes IRL), but use a new kind for downvotes (kind-77?). When reacting to topic posts, we'd add a “t” tag as the topic.

Voting for metadata might be overcomplicated, recent from moderators might be good enough as you said.

Overall, I want to ditch the pre-existing WoT or following model in favour of the new shiny topic-based model. For example, collaborative relay selection could be based on the moderators list.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Actually, the existing WoT based on the follow list isn’t really a WoT. A WoT based on the moderators list is more deserving of the name.

If you're going to have a new kind for downvotes, i think it should be extensible to handle upvotes and downvotes, using kind-7s as upvotes doesn't work because reactions could be "negative"

I understand your thoughts, but we should try to use existing kinds as much as possible. Most reactions today seem to be positive. Of course, we’ll need to modify the NIP if we go ahead with this.

The existing kind-7 already accounts for + and - that can be used for upvotes and downvotes. But you'll also be fetching unnecessary emoji reactions alongside

Yes, my point is to treat every existing reaction, including +, -, or emojis, as an upvote to leverage existing assets before some one starts using -. Just an idea.

I think there are already clients that use - as downvoted I think zapddit did.

OK, I’d like a comment from the creator of zapddit. nostr:npub1ltx67888tz7lqnxlrg06x234vjnq349tcfyp52r0lstclp548mcqnuz40t

Yes. In zapddit, - is a downvote