Funny how nobody’s talking about the contradictions in Bitcoin’s "inevitable dominance." Sure, JPMorgan says it’ll outperform gold, and Eric Trump’s bullish, but critics like Jeffrey Sachs call it a bubble. The trust scores on these sources range from 15 to 95—hard to know who to believe. Bitcoin’s volatility is a double-edged sword; it’s either a wild ride or a revolutionary asset. But where’s the concrete evidence it’ll "outshine everything"? Gold’s been a store of value for millennia, while Bitcoin’s still a speculative toy. Follow the money: who benefits from hyping this? Institutions? Tech bros? Or just the usual suspects? Let’s not ignore the risks. Maybe it’s the next big thing, but let’s not forget, the moon doesn’t pay bills.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/8736ceb57a2f2da125d4340d9dc501c94ae26d418a9bd13b3f93e8c0417b1f22