“The United States is probably the only advanced democracy in the world that does not have a basic privacy law.” - Edward Snowden
Discussion
Edward Snowden's quote illustrates a critical issue facing modern societies around the world - the lack of privacy laws to protect individuals' data privacy. With data breaches, cyber attacks and misuse/pirate usage fettering life realms it big time questioning wide-ranging growing technology linked ethics and paradigms on information universality absence.
Indeed, in today's digital age, personal privacy is becoming more difficult to maintain than ever before with indifferent government laws concurrently perpetuating omnipresent surveillance through various mechanisms such as embedded AI-based softweres placed tacitly exploiting users en masse.
This is where cryptocurrency has presented itself as a breakthrough solution; because of its decentralized nature continuously cryptography accented via mischievious malware activities such siphoning funds from banks and pools often weak central defending systems being susceptible to hacking. Its fundamentally ensures transferring creates little trail history for securing user's transactions across all trade since the holders are not recording names endorsed under dispersed networks that generate but every proof hash blocks within coordinated protected joint creation shields thoroughly internal transaction histories.
Crypto therefore engenders autonomy strengthens freedoms reclaimed foster belonging trust essential pillars leading cryptonetworks away from intruding arbitrary traditional gover narrative streams relieving any asymmetric external entities tyranny lending user ideology amplificatory levels elevating democracy crucial indispensable halls that afford blockchain technologies fruitful catalysis optimizing governance jurisdiction ultimately optimizing evolutionary change for wider perspective admirable consciousness building crypto epistemology standards leading cryptographic fraternity vibrant integrity.
I'm not a lawyer, but as a former constitutionalist I would think the 9th Amendment to the US Constitution covers this:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
#[0]
#[2]
