Are you post or a-mill? Just interested.
Former premillennial dispensationalist here.
Cure #1 : theology - specifically, federal/covenant theology
Cure #2 : history - study the progressive era leading up WWI, and read Rothbard, [War Guilt in the Middle East](https://cdn.mises.org/Left%20and%20Right_3_3_4_0.pdf).
"Not all #Israel is Israel."
"If you are in Christ, then you are Abraham's offspring indeed, subject to all the promises."
"All the promises are 'yes and amen' in [Christ]."
Discussion
There's a lot of overlap, as I understand it, but I'm pretty decidely a-mil at this point. Riddlebarger's book was my first real exposure to it, and it answer many questions, corrected many interpretations, etc. As I got into Vos and Kline, it was only solidified further.
Yeah, Riddlebarger was my intro to amil as well. I usually find those who like Van Til to be more post. I am definitely more of an outlier at my church with most of them being post.
I like to remind those friends that Van Til dedicated some of his books to his favorite prof, Vos.
Van Til without Vos gets you Bahnsen. Van Til with Vos gets you (idk, maybe) Kline or VanDrunen.