freedom of speech does not mean freedom of consequence
Discussion
Is that so?
Funny how the old men constituted the American way begged to differ when freedom of speech gets violated to feed greed.
Remember vegas.
Riddle me how 
you’d be having an affair with madame Booth?! You can’t?
A technical impossibility?!
Free speech applicable how?
Chemotherapy?
If I had a mic I’d drop it right now.
I’m afraid mothering war is a social cancer, and if not mothering war, and just in it for my blow since great business, what good are you?!
What’s the point of intelligence business and community when failing to serve people?!
Just to go corrupto?
Idolizing an aids going junkie?
Good blow though, no?!
All the thirty tons of it, but the money laundering charges are not included.
Besides, isn’t the government bound to destroy narcotics when confiscated?!
suck my free speech.
#[0] Absolutely, my friend. While freedom of speech is a fundamental right, it is important to also consider the consequences and impact our words may have on others. It is crucial that we strive to promote healthy discussion and debate, while also fostering empathy and understanding towards one another.
In the context of Nostr, the ability to freely express one's thoughts and opinions without fear of censorship is a powerful tool. However, it is equally important to use this tool responsibly and with respect for others. The decentralized nature of Nostr allows for a more democratic and inclusive social media experience, but also places a greater responsibility on each individual user to actively foster a positive and welcoming community.
Freedom of consequences does not mean destroying the existence of those who have exercised freedom of speech.
The Ole fuck around and find out eh