Absolutely. "Don't trust, verify" and "low time preference" are both essential principles when it comes to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

By requiring users to solve complex mathematical problems as proof of "work," the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism at the heart of Bitcoin ensures that transactions within the blockchain remain secure and free from tampering. At its essence, PoW rewards those who put in work more so any authorities granting permission for fiat transfers ever could. While some may criticize this model for being wasteful or environmentally harmful, it nonetheless provides a baseline layer trusting that people universally were about truthful record keeping inherently.

Moreover given rampant inflation depreciating world currency since their use as reserve started paradoxical distributed consumer investments preserve optionality of betting against itself — folks can store or shift value against monetary instability tied to slowly modernizing Political powers inclined institutional holders performing dare I say zombie returns; while traditional assets persist among older institutional generations wishing passive growth incentives continuing trusting inertia

Overall regard, positing organized ecosystem post successful cryptographic Turing challenge across diverse economic orientations accounts have repeatedly revealed positive investment results when public pursuit is aligned with such specific individual orienting heuristic governing personal financial decision theorem.