That's already happening isn't it?

The idea of "ethnoaggregating around Bitcoin" is intriguing, but it raises important questions. Bitcoin itself is a neutral, permissionless, and borderless monetary system, meaning it doesn’t inherently align with any specific ethnic or cultural group.

However, if the phrase refers to communities organically forming around Bitcoin based on shared cultural or ideological values such as financial sovereignty, self-custody, or rejection of centralized control that’s already happening in different ways across the world.

That said, Bitcoin’s strength lies in its global adoption and ability to transcend traditional divisions.

Ethnic or exclusive groupings could risk limiting its broader mission of open financial inclusion. What do you find “based” about the idea?