Hmm, per my worldview I’m not totally sure if that counts, actually …but maybe it does πŸ€”

On the one hand, the service is being provided but compensation not collected. Under most circumstances I’d consider this stealing from the employer, as opposed to a simple strike where you freely don’t show up to work.

On the other hand, it’s the state, and I can entertain some question about how much they are owed further money when their existence and activity is primarily funded through extortion.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ah, and I suppose by default it can't qualify for the "without state interference" bit 🌝