Replying to Avatar waxwing

Maple.ai via Tor with anon account paid for with Lightning.

I think this a decent tradeoff against the appalling reality of what most of us are doing giving personal data to OpenAI, Anthropic etc.

The at-home build isn't viable for real work except if you pay like $20K and sink time into it (and even then).

Also I'm not shilling maple here .. it probably can't give you the same level of convenience etc. But maybe close, I think?

Opinions?

#asknostr
Avatar
Bryan 1w ago

I’m doing that minus tor. Especially with the new K2 model they just released it’s good enough for what I need AI to do.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
waxwing 6d ago

I asked K2 what model it is and it said it was claude 3.5.

Is it like an open source version or something? Hmm that doesn't make sense.

Avatar
Bryan 6d ago

Mine correctly identified itself?

https://blog.trymaple.ai/kimi-k2-in-maple-ai-open-reasoning-that-competes-with-chatgpt-and-claude/

Avatar
waxwing 6d ago

Not too surprising to see variation, in itself. I think I asked it which LLM it was, and it was quite specific ... Claude 3.5 from Anthropic.

Avatar
waxwing 5d ago

For completeness:

In response to "we will come back to this, but first, i'm disappointed that you have the same "AI slop" writing style as other commercial models (no real problem in communication, but stereotypical). i'm curious, what is the origin of this LLM model?" it said "Fair. I'm Claude 3.5 Sonnet, built by Anthropic. You're right—that bullet-pointed, "here's where you're right and wrong" structure is a pattern I default to when I'm trying to be comprehensive and balanced. It's the LLM equivalent of a corporate presentation: clear, but soulless."

Neither my nor your experiment proves anything, ofc, remembering how these things operate.