Can censorship-resistance and privacy really coexist?
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcqpqexv22uulqnmlluszc4yk92jhs2e5ajcs6mu3t00a6avzjcalj9csna6fpr says they’re in contradiction.
nostr:nprofile1qyxhwumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmvqyw8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctvqqsfrjd9ux5hgsg5cmlz6cdwfh5zv2024g8m2t6g9zqf83l8uqm0svsjgnxal says that’s just lazy.
“If I can create an anonymous account and still post, I’m both private and censorship-resistant.”
Do you agree with Rockstar or do you see a tradeoff?
Drop your take 👇
Clip from my latest convo on the ALL IN BITCOIN podcast.
Links to full episode...
https://linktr.ee/allinbitcoin
#AllinBitcoin #Bitcoin #Nostr #Privacy #FreedomTech #UncleRockstar
If you don't have anonymity available, you don't have much censorship resistance, because some posts will get the people posting them targeted and they can't use your platform to deal with that problem
This isn't impacted by the fact that verified human identities will usually have more reach
No replies yet.
