incorrect.
without consensus on how the base protocol operates, there is no nostr.
Discussion
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqvyrx2prp0mne8pczrcvv38ahn5wahsl8hlceeu3f3aqyvmu8zh5szhc8sr nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqxtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzs9d84s8 nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqnjst6azswskk5gp3ns8r6nr8nj0qg65acu8gaa2u9yz7yszjxs9sxh02y3 nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqh50pnxqw9jg7dhr906fvy4mze2yzawf895jhnc3p7qmljdugm6gslajram nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqcgd35mxmy37vhkfcmjckk9dylguz6q8l67cj6h9m45tj5rx569cqry82a3 Umm if everyone agrees how things work that's centralization xir. You're a fake nostard.
incorrect.
NIPS, Git repos, contribution, pull requests, all facilitate consensus.
It is such in every FOSS project, including the Linux Kernel.
You are arguing from the intellectual depth of a Walmart kiddie pool. 🏊
Ahh my bad, I thought you meant consensus in the global state of events. But you mean consensus in what the protocol means itself, yes, that's going to be interesting to follow, that's a challenge we've seen with bitcoin as well.
oh gosh. yeah. i dont think that kind of “consensus” has ever been achieved in human history 👍