Why couldn't you have shared control of cooperations in a libertarian capitalist society? It's freedom to do what you want without much interference from the state. Cooperation is human nature, that's not left.
Discussion
Sure. That's just like company. Nobody forcing anyone to work in certain company. People choose where they want to work. That's capitalist kind of cooperation
It's libertarian right
What I don't get is libertarian left.
Or you can build business together with some dudes and share ownership with them. That is still libertarian right
It starts going leftward if the business adopts leftward principles of co-operative ownership. For instance, if the business required new employees (or new customers) to buy into its governance & capital structure as a condition of doing business, I think that would read as “left.” But it’s still “voluntary” in the libertarian sense.
That would make it left just within that business scope then. Not the larger whole community
And the need to pay to join in makes it kind of capitalist.
My main problem grasping the concept of libertarian left is on associations/municipalism/etc to maintain/manage the means of production. But any form or organisation bound to have a leader, or at least key influencer in the decision making. Which then make it tend to the Auth spectrum rather than lib spectrum
Im still thinking the political spectrum should just have 3 section
Auth left, Auth right, and libertarian
At which libertarian is in the middle, not exactly left or right. It is gonna be on the right side for bigger scale, but gonna be on the left side on the smaller scale (family is a lefty structure/organization)