And does a single hop fix this?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

you mean does sending the funds another hop mean the original sender doesn't know where they end up?

Sending from self to self once. Like single ricochet thing

yes

to nostr:npub1yxp7j36cfqws7yj0hkfu2mx25308u4zua6ud22zglxp98ayhh96s8c399s s point

If I send to you (A->B)

and then you send on to C,

because I'm the sender I know the address that appears onchain for B

when you spend to C I could see that address appears as an input in the tx.

but I *cant* know if its a real spend or if it's just being used as a decoy by someone else.

but as STN says, knowing that IS valuable information, particularly if you have a lot of it (like a custodial exchange wallet). it would be better if the sender didn't know the address of the receiver at all, as in paying an LN invoice.

I see. Thanks! Amounts still blinded I assume, but the anonset of 16 does leak some conditional probabilities that can be used to gain some info.

exactly 👍