buggy?

the assumption model does wacky things to people because they are placed in contexts which they are not really operating. people who assume others are running shadow campaigns or backend influence of candidates simply because of interaction is driven by the "information as profit" scheme of proof of stake. it's silly.

just because i interact with a politician doesn't preclude any support of influence - but that's all why i act in the open. there's no expectation my advice should be superior. it's freely given. those who operate as upload-only find this more difficult to navigate i believe, even if it's in the same sport. since there's no searchable proof.

regardless, myself and jack - as far as i know - only offer advisement. not paid influence or leverage. reciprocal only.