No strudel yet ❌
Where can I see this now?
Discussion
Highlighter
Just saw yes 🙏
Wanted to check how 30041 displays, as that's where the content is.
Njump just shows json
This means we can print books with 30040s and then create an article (or maybe a wiki page?) containing the same 30041s and Freerse, Coracle and Highlighter would probably display a readable version of the articles and Highlighter and Indextr (the one from nostr:npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf ) would display the proper 30040s as collections.
Damus can also display readable articles.
Yeah, #Nostrudel is at least willing to show something, which better than nothing, but not that great.
nostr:npub1ye5ptcxfyyxl5vjvdjar2ua3f0hynkjzpx552mu5snj3qmx5pzjscpknpr
Don't stress our favorite unicycler too much 😉.
Very much good enough for now 👌
Displaying at least something like this is best practice. Just leaving it blank or hiding it is unhelpful.
Oh, yeah, he's on vacation. Sorry!
no idea still yet where the funding will come from but i'm of the opinion it's a great base for cranking out a really slick fork... especially now it actually supports nip-42 - would be great if it's possible to simply add more control interfaces without interfering with the existing codebase...
i'm a total noob at typescript tho
Slick + More Control Interfaces 😂 😂 😂
Wet dreams of Nostr devs.
I'm here for it.
#nostrdesign in a 🥜 shell.
30041s are really important because they keep the subcontent out of the main feed.
Otherwise, every single Bible verse will have to be a wiki page or article page or note. There are almost 32k verses.
I think of it this way:
The 30040 is the binder and the 30041s are the individual papers in it, sorted in a particular order, all pertaining to some topic.
You could have 500 papers in that binder, or 5, but the binder always takes up the same amount of room on the shelf.
What is a 30041 event? I don't see any apps that support opening it
It is now supported by Indextr (still self-hosted, but soon to come on our website) and by Highlighter.com
Here is an example of both 30040 (metadata) and 30041 (sub-article or chapter).
wouldn't "section" be a better name?
the 30040 kind can be stacked in a tree right? so you can have like Genesis, Exodus, etc and then in each Chapter I, Chapter II, etc and in those probably better to then just use a simple header to indicate position
They can be stacked, yes, and the 30041 is where they actual content is.
It could be section, but i like the general idea. Novels may have sections, but one may want to fine grain it even more. The purpose for denoting sections ( through whatever method) is that the author explicitely is stating "this text belongs here, not over there". Makes a nice training set on "semantically closed" concepts.
The format is definitely most ammenable to "sections" though, given the title tag requirement.