For the #nostr developers:

I think - as we replied to each other with @elidy and as I read the protocol - the #nostr is not so censorship resistant as we think. I mean the media content, not the text part of a post. The media content is stored in a centralized space, so can easily been deleted by the owner of that storage space.

To improve and strengthen the censorship resistant behavior of Nostr, it is advisable to use the IPFS, the Inter Planetary File System instead, or similar (the IPFS is very similar to torrent). Therefore the media content will be replicated and also encrypted, so only the owner of the content can decrypt it (the IPFS stores the content as fragments (shards) and these fragments are individually encrypted by PKI). Because the IPFS behaves like blockchain (a replicated - not only distributed - ledger), you can always reach and share your content (each fragment are stored at least 3 different places). The only "drawback" of the IPFS that you have to pay for store the content (not always, I dealt with this a long time ago, I don't remember exactly). This is because, like the PoW in the case of Bitcoin blockchain) the Proof of Storage.

For all: the IPFS project has an own token (not coin!, this is a utility token), called Filecoin. So it is not shitcoin and not coin, it is a cryptoasset.

(And I have to apologize to those who operate centralized storage space.)

I'm open to a dispute about the mentioned above.