if you have questions i will always answer
if you disagree with me i will never block you
Discussion
Thats the spirit. 🧨✨️🥳
I will never block you too
More of a man than I, mute / button on ready. I double you and I'll would never disagree, but the communist, marxists socialists I can only take so much before fatigue sets in. So just don't be a commie and we're golden.
We need more people like you here🧡🫵🏽
Question: Why doesn't nostr:nprofile1qythwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnsv9ex2ar09e6x7amwqyvhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ycmgv43kktndv5hhyetvv9usqgzn9kpsmllqnsf7wh5tz3wgy4cclsftqqplv8tpayrhwgw8llunevk4p6dz support displaying svg files?
They are the leanest, most bad-ass of the image formats.
nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3qamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wd4hk6tcqyz4fq3ej2cpa4n20s9pqjdt8ju6kdh3mrcs2392hku5v80jvd2zyk8p4hdy does. ;-)
added to the list
the list is long
Are consensuses security holes?
no
it is simply the reality of a global distributed network
bitcoin being incredibly difficult to change is a feature
Consensus requires third parties to enter into consensus, and trusted third parties are security holes. For example, the security of the network's value integrity is left to the consensus among developers when we talk about BIP, or specifically regarding the Knots vs. Core issue. There is no true immutability. That's why I talk about security holes derived even from fiat regulatory issues that can lead to a legal ban on the very actors involved in "consensus." And ultimately, science itself is not based on consensus, despite what fiat academic bureaucrats would like.
What would you with your node if even one CP gets into opreturn? This is a sincere question.
csam is horrible and anyone involved in that should get the death penalty
So you wouldn’t run a node anymore?
I’d run my node knowing that we had all of time to find those who made it and eliminate them from civilization. I’d also be thankful that I’m participating in a monetary network that has the best chance of eliminating power structures that look the other way while my tax dollars get spent promoting degeneracy.
Is using an MK3 foolish? Are Q/M4 necessary upgrades? Thanks
mk3 is great
if you have a sizeable stack the mk4 / q is well worth the upgrade for the second secure element alone imo
internally the mk4 and q are the same, the q is bigger but adds a full keyboard, qr scanner, and batteries
Can you provide some best practices during this chain split?
Some things seem obvious like self custody, but I'm also hearing we shouldn't store too much BTC on a single UTXO. Previously I was under the impression we should be consolidating UTXO's. I'm concerned UTXO structure could be important when it comes time to move coins from the "bad" chain to the "good" one. Also, I have heard there can be privacy issues regarding both chains having identical wallet addresses, seed phrases, and so on. Any guidance would be much appreciated.
- self custody
- use your own node
- dont make rash decisions
- all will be fine, bitcoin is incredibly robust
in regard to your other concerns they are not really relevant unless a market develops trading between the two chains, then you will have the decision if you want to proceed on that, there could be privacy implications based on how you handle that
Hell yes. This is the way
Do you think only accepting BTC would help? Thanks for your part.
https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsxxd69sjpvra6ukx9qyu29qlg2p0deev4gp2ftjd7hepeszrkp27cah6dtv