Replying to Avatar Leo Wandersleb

Mind Boggling!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY

TL,DW:

* Pfizer vaccines did not contain DNA during the trials

* the final vaccine did contain DNA

* billions of snippets of DNA per vial

* quantities were almost within the legal limits for such "contamination" - some samples above, some samples below

* legal limits were established for un-coated DNA, not for stuff that was coated with lipid nano particles to get into cells - a standard that according to the professor was later found to be overly cautious for un-coated DNA that would get eliminated in the body anyway but a completely different thing for coated DNA

* DNA looks like chopped up standard tool to mass produce custom RNA - a contaminant Pfizer apparently tried to eliminate by chopping it up

* Chopped up means more pieces with each piece getting a chance of getting integrated in a vital spot of the cell's DNA, which could break the DNA and in the worst case cause cancer (he did talk abut DNA storing information for thousands of years but not specifically mentioned eggs or sperms being affected as his concern)

good summary!

The sequencing (that he also talks about and wants to habe funded) of random cells from random people to look for tiny pieces of DNA that could come from the vaccines sounds like a waste of resources without chance of success. Most cells have not come into contact with the vaccine. Many S-protein producing cells should have be killed by the immune system while they produced it. If he find an affected cell it must contain a characteristic piece of DNA that could not have been there naturally.

His answer to the publication question was weird. He easily could publish his vaccine vial sequencing results. He might have got the question wrong but that still leaves the question. Why did he not try to publish?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

> The sequencing [...] sounds like a waste of resources without chance of success.

Not a biologist myself but his worst fear is cancer so I don't see the chance of success too bad here. If you sequence cancer cells of vaccinated people who developed cancer after the Pfizer vaccine, his hypothesis could indeed be proven depending on the sequence found in cancer cells. He sequenced the contamination. Any non-trivially small chunk found in a cancer where by the nature of a cancer it would get reproduced would be an obvious proof of his hypothesis.

He gave two weird answers.

One was about publication: Yes, scientific papers tend to not publish non-results but that is also known to be a problem and therefore good scientific investigations get pre-registered and documented publicly anyway. Where did he share the nitty gritty of his findings?

The other weird answer was about the cost of proving his hypothesis where he said that testing any future booster vials would cost $60 what was completely not the question. He should have answered with the cost to sequence complete genomes of cancer tissue for many patients.

True. Sequencing tumors would make sense.

P.S.: nostr:npub1v0lxxxxutpvrelsksy8cdhgfux9l6a42hsj2qzquu2zk7vc9qnkszrqj49 something is weird with the TextNote I'm replying to here. I cannot see it in Snort and I even tried to re-broadcast (to my relays I suppose) in primal where I can see it but that gave me an error. Now opening my reply https://snort.social/e/nevent1qqs0ltz3tc2l6g9wac0gn8wnem5fu7p6tpxnpte2wuk896achxrv08cpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygzxljlrqe027xh8sy2xtyjwfzfrxcll8afxh4hh847psjckhkxwf5psgqqqqqqs8p5tu2 shows me a mostly blank page (logged in or private window) even though I saw this event in my profile.

... correction ... 12 minutes later things are loading now.

Yea its buggy atm, fixing on current build, should be deployed today hopefully

Should be fixed now