#[0]​ any plans to support kind 30023. Shows the first X amount of chars and β€œread more” expands it. Thoughts?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That's NIP-23 Long form content, right?

I have mixed feelings about it. I'd like to see it but we also have clients for articles/blogs now. Maybe there clients could support it and give users the option to enable or disable them?

The mix of short messages and long messages here makes it a little messy. Just thoughts/ideas on how to handle it…

Agree. I think the show more bounding box that clients are already using would be fine.

I just hope more people get used to writing the TL;DR version in the note and then add as a comment :).. but some insist in posting a giga Note spamming our feeds :)

Clients need to enforce max display length with β€œview more” or something like that.

Only problem is that I still have to download the whole thing.

Then just assume-valid and prune it lulz.

πŸ˜‚

damn it, came to make the same joke

definitely there could be a request filter for note size and a response that tells you the note IDs and the authors but not the contents

then a separate request for contents from authors that you trust or whatever your client decides that it wants to get

just getting a list of note IDs that you might be interested in but maybe contain spam or giant images would be a pretty cool response

could even be the same messages just with the content truncated or missing and a flag to let you know that it was truncated or missing

amethyst and iris already do this right?