Yeah, let's not give people stupid ideas. like...

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

how are we supposed to do that without nukes? We the people had access to all the same weapons as the government in 1791. Its as good as toilet paper today.

you don't need a nuke to shoot people in the head

You think they gonna mass bomb a land mass that they want all the land of? That's their bluff. Half a billion guns in our hands. They cant kill everyone and there are many many more of us. Plus, the VietCong did ok against planes and bombs and napalm.

i wish i were able to be as optimistic as you on this, however, i am ignorant of your mention of 'vietcong'. how did they deal with heavy artillery?

I dunno, but we lost to them in Vietnam. They knew the terrian. Same reason we cant win shit in the ME. And a people with nothing to lose tend to be the victors throughout history. US is big land mass. Even if it was all out war, lots of ground to cover and again, the local people know the local terrain.

And obviouslyI would rather not find out if I am right or wrong, but other than likely surgical strikes at specific targets, I really dont see them turning the land mass into a bombed out waste land. How's Gates and other parsites and such gonna have all their land if its gone? The billionaire class wouldnt allow it.

They can only afford psychological nukes.

🎯