I'm accustomed to being "invisible" to people I disagree with, but this may be the first time I've discovered I was invisible for agreeing too much.

In that discussion mine was one of the earliest replies, in which I acknowledged the evidence of a problem but disagreed with the proposed solution; offering a different solution. One quite in line with yours. The thread grew quite long, and included various viewpoints. No general agreement was reached, but positions were defended, elaborated and clarified calmly.

This new discussion seems less than completely frank about the last one, and framed like a damsel waving down a White Knight.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’m sorry you feel completely lumped in with what I’m addressing. I actually remarked in that discussion how impressed I was with the -general- trend of being careful to talk about trends as trends and not universalities. Including your input!

The discussion and its lower points did make me think again about this issue and the general low tone of other conversations on it I have personally been witness to.

Like I said, I’m hearing this thought a lot lately.

But yes, you did just now make some statements I have an issue with, and I addressed that. Including by calling attention to good things you said in the other conversation.