1. There is a high likelihood that COVID *was* a lab leak.
2. There is *overwhelming* evidence of that Russia helped Trump win in 2016.
His confident and swift ignorance should raise alarm bells for any person who calls themselves an independent thinker.
did he say the COVID thing? he speaks soo fast
Yes, but perhaps he’s saying that censorship leads from blocking hate speech to claims that COVID was a lab leak? It’s not clear. He speaks fast, and haltingly. It’s unpleasant. I don’t know the interviewer, but I find her line of questioning to be irritating and prosecutorial, as well.
(Also, I have not had coffee this morning.)
lol. gm
Can you point to any evidence that Russia helped Trump that isn't effectively, "trust this expert"?
Cuz it doesn't look overwhelming to me, and that doesn't look like independent thinking to me.
I can point to lots, yes. Between 2015 and 2017, I was quite well-read on the subject. You don’t have to trust me or any other expert. Just start by looking into Paul Manafort’s work as an unregistered foreign agent.
I can assure you Russia did not fabricate a populist movement that otherwise would not have existed
Your assurances are of little value to me.
as is your "*overwhelming*" evidence
You don’t have to take my word for it. It’s all public information. As are the reports of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee, the ODNI, and the FBI.
I already recommended that anyone interested in the subject could simply start by looking into Paul Manafort’s history. Spend the next 3-5 mins looking at the search results of “Paul Manafort Oleg Deripaska.”
nah, I'm good thanks
And that’s why your “assurances” are less-than-useless to me, or anyone else.
You just waltz into the thread, spew some ignorant dogshit, and when I point you in a direction that might remove some ignorance, you dismiss it.
JFC, we’re doomed.
Oh well, I hope it was worth it.
