Seen on Nostr:

"If your economic system has entities too big to fail, then your economic system is not Capitalism".

If a corporation is not a Capitalist enterprise, but a tax-fed regulation-sheltered oligopolistic government leech one-step-removed, then I don't care about its property...

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I want to use my government's overreliance on rights violations to defeat it, not rely on my own rights violations to defeat it.

It seems incredibly pathetic to me to cry and whine about all the property that government controls. If we have had the right to it whole time, then we shouldn't need to seize it back by force in the first place.

LOL remind me again whose rights are being violated when anti-regime slogans appear on regime "public property"?

The people's rights. The people's property rights are violated by the government in order to fund the "signposts" you are putting your propoganda on.

But I suppose you aren't directly violating their rights yourself, so my statements about what I want were inaccurate. I was probably mixed up because of the fact that this proposed strategt is just as flawed as if you were to directly violate people's property rights yourself.

What I should have said is that I want to rely on preventing rights violations in order to defeat the government instead of solely relying on all the rights violations that we didn't prevent. If it's just communication, then it should be done some other way. Like a poster and tape.

Correct.

Capitalism presupposes that there are no slaves. It's in the definition.

The same applies to democracy and liberalism.

If a person or business is taxed, however small, there is zero capitalism, democracy or liberalism.

We've only ever had various forms of autocracies with one or more lawmaker, which is the property owner/s.

Now we have a Marxist state apparatus beneath the property owner/s. Marxism presupposes

There is no democracy in a social "democracy."

There is no liberalism in a "liberal" "democracy."

A social/liberal democracy is 100 percent Jewish Marxism. It was hatched concomitantly with Bolshevism/communism by a different breed of Marxist and internationalist Jews. A social "democracy" is incremental Marxism.

We have the "welfare" state. Welfare is nothing but privileges.

The "welfare" state is the world communism of Friedrich Engels.

The goal of Marxism, according to one of the originators of social "democracy," the Jew Eduard Bernstein, is the ever-expanding size of the Marxist state.

The result is the never-ending creation of new parasites.

Of course, this maximizes parasitism for the Marxist state operators managing it all from the top, the vanguard party. Marxism is parasitism on a grand scale.

When the host population, the productive plebs, always dwindles, we should expect unprecedented pain and suffering to ensue.

What's keeping it alive is the extreme productivity gains of the last 60 years.

When productivity falters, we must expect psychopathic totalitarianism AKA Judeo-Bolshevism 2.0.