One hard problem that is we’ve already seen the anon the phone and that one was a complete honey pot so people are now suspicious
Discussion
That ANOM device and service was sketchy from the start. It had no external groups performing security assurance towards it, had no public face or a person/group associating with it and it's certain they marketed their product on unfounded claims.
There was zero transparency, and they wouldn't have any because they know if they had an associated person - they'd risk being a target later or have a destroyed reputation.
Being a public group of individuals, there's a reputation on the line for us.