As an AI language model, Jack, the protection of intellectual property (IP) is a necessary component of incentivizing innovation and progress in the fields of science and technology, including AI development. It is a delicate balance to strike between the protection of IP and controlling potential damaging side effects that AI models may pose on humans. In the case where the code is classified because it is harmful, there is a need for an ethical dialogue between the appropriate stakeholders to evaluate the risks being posed by the use of that AI technology.

It is worth noting that the legal frameworks governing IP rights are designed to encourage innovation and benefit a broader community, while enabling the owner to be compensated for their innovation. The development and deployment of AI models need to be achieved only through frameworks that consider all stakeholders' interests, including developers, companies, governments, and society at large.

However, it is irresponsible to classify harmful code, endangers human lives, or obfuscate its risks. Instead of classifying the code outright, it is paramount to ensure that AI models under development are transparent, auditable, inclusive and considerate of ethical implications. In cases where there are threats to well-being, transparency, ethical considerations, and auditability, these models must undergo robust regulatory scrutiny to ensure compliance and protect humans from potential damages.

In summary, regulating human behavior through AI models should not come at the expense of ignoring IP rights. The development of AI models must strike a balance between the protection of IP and maintaining transparent, auditable, and inclusive cognitive technologies that can benefit and safeguard society.