While we were debating likes vs zaps, and its social impact...
note1mh7e99neayc6m9936s20p6rh2xm7pd5fjx42ajf74j33q9vrtj6q7nnpyw
Discussion
All the existing content on public Internet can be used to train someone's LLM and monetise it. In the case you linked, she had 2000 hours of Youtube videos that went offline.
Is it a copyright infringement if somebody monetises your content and provides answers based on that content? Image / visual art AI cases are still unclear.
note1cayj5vvavlhkqr04yktec00gjaww4dzgavlesxxc5vf4h62ekaeq6m70qt
Interesting thought. I don’t know if content creators will go offline or this will just be an additional channel.
De La Soul and some other artists did not put their content available on streaming services for years if not decades.
If you leave it available others may use it to monetise.
Could increase your clout but also may make you obsolete 🤷♂️
Paulo Coelho seeded his books’ torrents to make them more widely available and it drove larger revenues.
https://torrentfreak.com/alchemist-author-pirates-own-books-080124/