Regardless of what you think of him, watch this 10 minute video from Russell Brand and tell me he isn't preaching purplepill logic at the top of his lungs.
Someone fucking onboard him like yesterday.
If you haven't watched the Joe Rogan interview with Terrence Howard, watch it too!
So. Curious why you want anyone watching the Terrance Howard Episode. I watched 5 minutes of it days ago and I am only now regaining my ability to add double digit numbers.
There's nothing forcing you to subscribe to ulterior logic, but I enjoy the exercise. Today I had an idea for a new product which would leverage his design principles. Whether or not one can defy gravity, I believe there is truth to be found amongst the chaotic element of perspective.
tl;dr I found it interesting, to say the least.
My main reason for not taking him seriously was that he constantly described the current theories using language that demonstrated that not only did he not understand the theories he was proposing an alternative to, he didn't even know the meaning of the words he was using to describe it.
I am very happy to entertain alternatives but it was all too clear that he didn't actually have alternate ideas, he just had misfiring synapses chosing words nearly at random. Not completely random, the words generally had a similar sound to the one he probably actually wanted. I just hope that he is ok.
I can understand your position and I don't inherently disagree. I do believe algebraic function exists logically in our minds, which I guess his position is to try and reform this conceptually. But the way I interpret this is him suggesting an alternative thesis for algebraic function. In fact, somewhere on his website, he digs into this with a 10 minute video that explains a bit of new math that revolves around his 1x1=2 narrative.
While I'm not going to try and sell any drone ideas to Raytheon or Boeing, or tell any universities they are teaching illogical math, I do believe math is merely a language, and there is room for alternatives to the status quo.
I would wonder- has his math already been postulated in the past? I assume it has been done at some point and decided it was the "inappropriate method" for the demands of the time. However in a free society, we would be free to practice any math, including experimental.
I was really curious how one would best replicate his mathematics via programming logic? What would applications operating on his system of logic be like?
You fall for their #Magjick and specifically this #Magician too easily ;) #TheAA ;) See #OccultWarfareTutorials https://www.cipherassets.com/2022/11/operation-order-of-nine-angles-opo9a.html (they're free). 7777777
I cannot discern this from a bot post. The link you provided offers downloads and does not incentivize me to trust the author.
Feel free to enlighten me in some way or this will simply be regarded spam.
Awesome chat between Terrence and Joe! Fascinating knowledge. Russel, meh.
Where Russell is speaking to is more about where companies are reaching deep into our data and censoring at their discrepancy. This acutely reflects Nostr's sole purpose- to remain censorship resistant and decentralized.
Agree the other interview was excellent 💯
