Garbage from Forbes - insinuating this fraud is Satoshi is how his scam continues to reside in the public space year to year

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

💩

But they aren’t saying that

How can you take out patents on implementations created in open source software released over ten years ago by an anonymous developer? 🤔

nostr:nevent1qqsg4w3l4u82ca8edxdnwp29y5zx2vaa7kdz0yvcnszm9prrt4ngqvcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvupzqhyflt84tg0zk3x5d9lqnze56e3jlanxm84cr89gkfdv977twnwmqvzqqqqqqyv0vgg8

Hopefully he's first in line for his booster jabs

Forbes appears as some reputable magazine, but it's really a dressed up tabloid that anyone can write for

Not even. They only write paid advertisements. Tabloids are just old school click bait and can be interesting and hilarious. Forbes is neither.

I didn't think the article said or implied that at all. If anything, the author suggested that Wright's claims were dubious by outlining the exhausting history quite well. The article gently questions what impacts, if any, patents and IP could have over open sourced projects. I've read articles by this author before, I think he wrote the one of Nostr. The headline is a bit vague so I can see how it reads like that. Here's a pay wall removed link:

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forbes.com%2Fsites%2Fdigital-assets%2F2023%2F07%2F12%2Fsatoshi-or-not-here-he-comes%2F%3Fsh%3D1014cd572cb3

Thanks. I saw at least 2 Forbes tweets that imply he's Satoshi referencing the article, so boo on them misleading with jeadlines and tweets

Oh gross. No Bueno. "We are all Satoshi" except him. 💯👌

That first sentence implies it.

Look at the look in his eyes. His ego is big. Satoshi is a synonym of egolessness.

Forbes.... he paid to publish that article. I think all they do is paid advertising.

Haha. Oh totally. Now that I read it again. The headline is not representative of the article though.

Clickbait headlines. Ugh.