Congrats nostr:nprofile1qqs0m40g76hqmwqhhc9hrk3qfxxpsp5k3k9xgk24nsjf7v305u6xffcprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucm4wfex2mn59en8j6f0qythwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnjv4kxz7t9wgh8xef0c6q5g0 nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4spz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qg7waehxw309ahx7um5wgkhqatz9emk2mrvdaexgetj9ehx2ap0ege3s8 🙌🏻

Do you read the comments here?

Fix your wallet!!!

⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀

⠸⠿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣄⠀

⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⠀

⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢀⣠⣿⣿⠟⠀

⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⣿⣿⣥⣄⠀

⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⣿⣧

⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣿⣿⣿

⢰⣶⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣶⣾⣿⣿⠿⠛⠁

⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⡇⠀⠀

Hi Matt, I love your content. Smooth talker ;)

You push a lot pro Knots and anti Core recently and I'm honestly undecided.

There's some inconsistency in your explanations. On the one hand you celebrate Knots hitting then 15% or in a more recent video 17% but on the other hand you rightfully state that a malicious actor couldn't change policy by spinning up a million nodes. Consequently tracking these %% terms is quite meaningless. You'd need to track former Core nodes switching to Knots or something cause even if you tracked the absolute number of Core nodes going down it would be a very weak signal as it would be trivial to spin up Core nodes as soon as people would care about that narrative.

So running Knots and publicly saying so is a political statement but what else is it? Will it get heard?