it seems to me if cw won both of these cases, he would be held in fiduciary responsibility for everything since he claims to be satoshi. like i have said: let him "be satoshi". since he is not, he will fall victim to his own scam. the prescient for open source liability is negated with a simple waiver of liability held by each developer - all pow is sourced to the white paper/genesis. you don't sue the world because you lose your car keys: it's negligence on the part of the courts to entertain him. production of his own keys without proof of a hack is his own responsibility. regardless: let him be satoshi and take fiduciary responsibly for the blockchain. it will bankrupt him. it will also unearth his drivers - because he won't want to be accountable so he will turn in those pressuring him to antagonize the system.

file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/02/02/C1F26563-4D50-4C5E-A155-46820C9D7C02/Tulip-v-Van-Der-Laan-judgment-030223.pdf