The downfall of 1984

Every engineer or programmer tasked with building the digital architecture of slavery will be confronted with his/her understanding of code and the downstream results of code.

This is why in fiction, the engineers of the Death Star intentionally introduced vulnerabilities.

The reason is simple.

The engineer or programmer can read code and blueprints. They can put together in their mind a map over plausible risks and outcomes from a given set of digital architectures.

A good programmer understands the far downstream implications of a given code.

As a result, we should expect that a certain percentage of engineers and programmers will defect from totalitarian projects, either visibly or cunningly, by introducing vulnerabilities to the totalitarian architecture, once they understand the inevitable outcome of that code.

Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 can be likened to destructive computer viruses or malware.

Investigating their code, a programmer or logically thinking person can reasonably well predict their outcome.

Every programmer understands what a 1984 society leads to:

When you have a highly complex archipelago of code, such as a society, centrally planning that code is an extremely risky strategy.

If you are also prevented from fixing bugs, errors and obvious harms in the code, the code will spiral downward toward greater and greater harm.

Next, add that in a 1984 society all words are redefined to their opposite.

Imagine being a programmer trying to fix a code while every term you use have the opposite meaning in relation to its practical result.

Every programmer will realize that this approach is 100% doomed.

Not to mention all the dependencies in a centrally planned 1984 architecture.

Every harmful piece of code in the governing architecture will propagate to every other part, since they depend on the central authorization.

Corrupt the core and everything gets corrupted.

While an array of programmers will continue to work for the system, many engineers who understand cause and effect enough to read the code sufficiently far downstream will join the liberty side.

One day we will be thankful for the vulnerabilities in the 1984 architecture.

Bitcoin represents the vehicle for replacing the 1984 central planning architecture with decentralization of power, liberty and property rights for all.

When every individual can protect their own person, family and property, power is decentralized and harmful dependencies are deconstructed.